Good briefing doc with item 2
1.India's Gene Campaign opposes import of GM rice into E.U.
2.Europe urged to reject modified rice
1.Gene campaign opposes import of GM rice into E.U.
By Our Special Correspondent
The Hindu, MARCH 6
Non-governmental organisations, Gene Campaign and Friends of the Earth have objected to a proposal for granting permission to a multi-national company by the European Commission for importing genetically modified (GM) rice into the European Union as "cattle feed."
They petitioned the EC last week that such a move would have grave implications for the natural rice germplasm in the rice-growing regions of the developing world where the export markets are being created through this move.
The multinational, Bayer CropScience Limited, headquartered in Germany, has sought permission to import and process genetically modified herbicide-resistant rice (LLRice62) into the E.U. not for cultivation, because it does not intend to grow this rice in Europe, even though rice is cultivated in five E.U. member States. These are: Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal and France.
The fear is that this rice would be imported from India, paving the way for the cultivation of genetically modified rice in its centre of origin, i.e., India, and thus leading to genetic contamination of the native gene pools and jeopardising world food security. India is involved in research in GM rice in the public and private sectors. Other countries where such research is on are Bangladesh, Thailand, Philippines and Vietnam.
Addressing a press conference here on Thursday, the Director of Gene Campaign, Suman Sahai, said that it was particularly ironic that India and other centres of diversity for rice could end up jeopardising their principal food source for producing "animal feed" to support the meat consumption of the West. The risks involve causing allergy, toxicity and even gene sterility.
"There is something decidedly unethical about Bayer wanting to protect the few rice-growing states of the E.U. by not seeking permission for cultivation in Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal or France. It is willing to put at risk the food staple of the poor countries to support the unsustainable consumption of the West," she said.
Developing countries such as India where rice is grown have a weak or even non-existent regulatory framework for GMOs. Farmers in such countries are not aware of the larger issues and the possible implications of GM rice in their fields and, thus, are not really able to take an informed decision on whether or not to grow the rice, Dr. Sahai added.
2. Europe urged to reject modified rice
World's staple food at risk from multinationals
Press Release, March 22 2004
Friends of the Earth Europe
Coalition against BAYER-Dangers (Germany)
European Governments are being urged to reject a Genetically Modified (GM) rice in order to protect the world's largest staple food from falling into the hands of multinational companies.
Member states have only until Sunday 28th March to object to an application by German-based Bayer Cropscience to import into the EU a GM rice that has been modified to resist the companies own herbicide, glufosinate ammonium.
It is the first time that a company asks for the authorisation of GM rice in Europe. Both Friends of the Earth Europe and the German "Coalition against Bayer Dangers" (CBG) claim that an EU approval of the rice will send a dangerous signal to developing countries and could lead to the eventual corporate take-over of one of the worlds most important foods. Currently 2.5 billion people depend on rice as a staple food.
As well as the dangers to the worlds food supply Friends of the Earth and CBG are concerned that
* Long term studies to examine the potential for more serious health effects were not carried out
* Feeding studies on broilers conducted by Bayer were judged by the UK authorities to be of "limited capacity" to identify adverse effects, while in a pig feeding study a difference in response (increased weight gain) was observed in pigs who ate the GM rice
* Bayer does not provide any information on the likelihood of imported rice being spilled and the effects this might be have on the 5 southern EU member states that currently grow rice (Italy, Greece, Spain, Portugal and France).
Geert Ritsema of Friends of the Earth: "This genetically modified rice not only poses a health risk to European consumers but could also endanger the livelihoods of millions of people outside the EU. Europe has a strong moral obligation to take this into account when they assess this rice."
"Allowing the import of GM rice into Europe will give the green light to multinationals to promote this unsustainable form of farming in developing countries. Allowing the worlds most important staple food to fall into the hands of companies like Bayer is a dangerous and unprecedented move."
Philipp Mimkes of CBG: "Agricultural biotechnology has so far been a complete disaster for Bayer. This application for genetically modified rice will become another chapter in their book of failures. It's time that Bayer quit producing genetically engineered food."
Geert Ritsema, GMO campaign coordinator Friends of the Earth Europe, mobile: +31-6-290 05 908, office: +32-2-542 0182
Philipp Mimkes, Coalition against BAYER-dangers / Germany; +49-(0)211-333 911, [email protected] www.CBGnetwork.org (English and German)
Briefing about the food safety and environmental risks of Bayer's GMO rice
The GMO Directive 2001/18 requires that member states and the Commission "ensure that all appropriate measures are taken to avoid adverse effects on human health and the environment which might arise from the deliberate release or the placing on the market of GMOs"
And recital 11 states that: "Placing on the market also covers import. Products containing and/or consisting of GMOs covered by this Directive cannot be imported into the Community if they do not comply with its provisions."
Food safety considerations
Friends of the Earth believes that there are several serious concerns about the safety of LLrice62 for use in human food.
* The genetic analysis of the impact of the inserted genes on the rice indicated the possibility of an alteration in the plant metabolism as a result of the genetic modification; at the very least this was not ruled out by Bayer.
* No examination of the GM rice was done to make sure that unanticipated changes to its metabolism had not occurred
* Changes were observed in known compositional compounds of rice, including a substantial increase in the amount of existing allergenic compounds.
* One of the feeding studies conducted by Bayer was judged by the UK authorities to be of "limited capacity" to identify adverse effects, while in the other a difference in response (increased weight gain) was observed for consumption of the GM rice.
* Long term studies to examine potential for more serious health effects were not carried out.
Taken together, Friends of the Earth considers that the evidence suggests that unexpected changes could have occurred in the GM rice which could affect its nutritional value and safety for human consumption.
Rice is a staple food for 2.5 billion people. For many of those people, including citizens of the EU, it can make up a large proportion of the diet. The US Government has stated that when assessing GM foods for its own livestock, regulators should take particular care because "a single plant product may constitute a significant portion of the animal diet... Therefore, a change in nutrient or toxicant composition ... may be a very significant change in the animal diet" (emphasis added)1. If this argument is valid for US cattle, what about the humans around the world who could end up eating GM rice as the mainstay of their diet?
The Cartagena Protocol On Biosafety to the Convention On Biological Diversity notes that there are "limited capabilities of many countries, particularly developing countries, to cope with the nature and scale of known and potential risks associated with living modified organisms". The decisions by the European Union with respect to this GM rice will therefore be extremely influential in countries with limited resources to undertake their own regulatory review. The EU authorities must take the assessment of this rice extremely seriously - and ensure that it is completely safe for consumption as a large proportion of the diet - because this assessment will affect people not just in the EU, but around the world.
No information on whether GM rice could escape into the EU environment
Bayer's application is for import of the GM rice but not cultivation. Rice is grown in 5 southern EU member states - Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal and France. Although gene flow to crop rice or weedy red rice is possible in such areas2,3,4, Bayer said in its application that it considered this risk to be only 'theoretical', because LLRICE62 is not intended to be grown in Europe (Page 43 of notification). However, nowhere in its application has Bayer provided data to show that grains will not be imported into regions where rice is grown and that it cannot escape. Bayer did not provide any information on the proportion of imported rice that may contain viable rice and whether or where spillages of imported rice have occurred in the past.
Environmental impacts in third countries.
One of the key concerns raised by the UK authorities with respect to herbicide tolerant crops (and the subject of four years of field trials in the UK) was the impact of the changed use of agricultural areas. In the United States, around half of natural wetlands have been lost in the last century and rice fields provide a vital food resource for wetland birds as a result. The weed seeds and invertebrates of rice fields are known to be important food sources for wetland birds. If the use of herbicide tolerant rice reduces such biodiversity, in the same way as has been shown for GM beet crops and spring oilseed rape in the UK trials, then the production of Liberty link rice in the US could have serious impacts on wild birds in the United States and other countries where the crop is grown.
Resistance to the herbicide may develop rapidly.
One of the key weeds that rice farmers need to control is weedy rice. Liberty Link rice has been promoted in the United States as a means of controlling weedy rice in particular. However, cultivated and weedy rice are so closely related that they can easily cross breed. recent research from China, designed to replicate the occurrence of wild rice in the field, found transgene escape to wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) occurring at the rate of 1.21 and 2.19 % in the field5. A recent study modelling commercial production of glufosinate tolerant rice in Latin America predicted that the development of herbicide resistant weedy rice populations would occur within 3 to 8 years6. This will mean that farmers will have to use more herbicides to control these herbicide resistant weed populations.
Impacts on centres of agricultural biodiversity
Dispersal of transgenes into wild rice, non GM rice and traditional varieties of rice would be of particular concern in those areas which are centres of agricultural biodiversity, such as India. The importance of protecting such world resources cannot be over stated; rice gets its resistance to two of Asia's four main rice diseases from a single sample of rice that came from central India7.
1 Guest, G. 1992. Response to FDA Draft Federal Register Notice on Food Biotechnology
2 OECD (1999) Series on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No.14. Consensus document on the biology of Oryza sativa (rice). ENV/JM/MONO(99)26
3 Messegeur, J. et al (2001) Field assessments of gene flow from transgenic to cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) using a herbicide resistance gene as tracer marker. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 1151-1159.
4 Zhang, N., Linscombe, S. & Oard, J. (2003) Out-crossing frequency and genetic analysis of hybrids between transgenic glufosinate herbicide-resistant rice and the weed, red rice. Euphytica 130: 35-45.
5 Chen LJ et al. (2004) Gene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) to its weedy and wild relatives Annals of Botany 93 (1): 67-73
6 Madsen KH, Valverde BE, Jensen JE (2002) Risk assessment of herbicide-resistant crops: A Latin American perspective using rice (Oryza sativa) as a model Weed 16 (1): 215-223
7 World Resources Institute http://www.wri.org/wri/biodiv/agrigene.html
Coalition against BAYER-dangers www.CBGnetwork.org [email protected] Fax: (+49) 211-333 940 Tel: (+49) 211-333 911
please send an e-mail for receiving the English newsletter Keycode BAYER free of charge. Italian/French/Spanish newsletters also available.
Go to a Print friendly Page
Email this Article to a Friend
Back to the Archive