Activists putting children's lives at risk say Kendra & co. (28/6/2004)

Now here's a funny thing. Earlier today we quoted from an article from Spiked-online in which Prof Colin Berry of the Scientific Alliance attacks the precautionary principle, making specific reference of the dangers of over-precaution in relation to children. http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=3974

The article also includes a specific reference to an upcoming World Health Organisation conference on 'Children's heath and the environment' in Budapest. And, as it happens, this also seems to be the focus of a campaign from the International Policy Network.

The following are entries from press releases on the IPN's website that Dr Ignacio Chapela has drawn to our attention. They include one for a new book edited by Julian Morris and Kendra Okonski: 'Environment & Health: Myths & Realities'.

Kendra, it may be remembered, came to fame at the World Summit on Sustainable Development when she served as principle cheer leader to The Fake Parade. http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?ArcId=288

Since then she has continued as Julian Morris's side- kick, winning further fame for her attacks on climate change science, sustainable development and fair trade.

Ignacio comments on her latest effort - the new IPN book she has co-edited with Morris:

" It seems, from the description of its wisdom, that the main risk to human health and survival in our times is the little bunch of crazy activists who are planting scare stories that are more destructive than dirty nukes. Take note.

As explained in the press release, "issues" are exaggerated by activists for political agendas, which is why the book is published to set the record straight - the fact that its publication and media campaign was timed to coincide with the "Future of Children" meeting of the WHO in Budapest is a mere coincidence and NOT related to furthering political agendas, of course."

For more information on the IPC, Kendra etc. see GM Watch's IPN profile at http://www.lobbywatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=155&page=I.


**Excessive "precaution" puts children's lives at risk; WHO and governments must prioritise, say experts. 2004-06-24

**Wealth means health 2004-06-14

**New book debunks environment, health myths Issues exaggerated by activists for political agendas, say scientists 2004-06-21


From 23-25 June 2004, environment and health ministers from 52 countries will gather under the auspices of the World Health Organization for a meeting called "The Future for Our Children" in Budapest, Hungary. The ministers will negotiate regulations to protect people, especially children, from environmental health risks.

In a new book - Environment & Health: Myths & Realities - 10 expert scientific contributors analyze key environment and health issues being discussed by the WHO. The book challenges the conventional wisdom that human health problems (cancer, disease and even death) are being caused and exacerbated by modern industrial society.

The book offers an overview by scientific experts of the available scientific evidence concerning the impact of pesticides, dioxin, nitrates, radiation, endocrine disruptors, global warming and the precautionary principle on human health.

The contributors show that many environment and health risks have been exaggerated, to the detriment of scientific research and public policy.

Environmental scare stories in the media have been unbalanced and thus are psychologically and economically detrimental to the average person. When scare stories are used to influence government regulations, the result is frequently economic harm, a lack of prioritization with few or no benefits for people.

The book specifically illustrates that:

· On balance synthetic pesticides are beneficial to humanity, enabling better nutrition and health, and environmental protection. Consumers and society have been distracted from measures, such as more consumption of fruits and vegetables, proven to reduce cancer. (Chapter 1)

· The effects of "gender-bending" chemicals -- endocrine disruptors -- on humans have not been established by science, but scientific evidence refuting the idea has been under-reported by the media. (Chapter 2)

· Dietary nitrates (caused by agricultural fertilizer run-off) pose no threat to human health. They do not cause "blue baby syndrome" (which is prevented by following simple hygiene rules), cancer or other health effects. (Chapter 3)

· Expenditures to prevent low doses of radiation are unnecessary and a wasteful use of society's resources, especially since natural radiation levels are far higher and cause no human health problems. (Chapter 4)

· Fears over dioxin poisoning are now totally unjustified and no unequivocal epidemiological evidence exists to link dioxin to cancer, reproductive or immune effects. (Chapter 5)

· Vector-borne diseases are extremely complex, and global warming alone is unlikely to cause these diseases to spread to new regions or to exacerbate malaria in endemic regions. Eliminating malaria altogether is a far more important priority. (Chapter 6)

· Overall human mortality from heat waves caused by global warming is not likely to increase. In fact, cold weather causes far more deaths than hot weather. The effects of warmer temperatures are generally beneficial in the medium term and for most of the world (Chapter 7).

· The precautionary principle reflects a general "chemo-phobia" in society, but is not a reliable guide for decision-makers. In fact, the precautionary principle may increase - not reduce - risks because it does not sufficiently direct scarce resources to the most serious risks. (Chapter 8)

The contributors share a mutual concern that science is being undermined by activist pressure groups which care more about media coverage than protecting human health and achieving environmental protection. While governments increasingly rely on science for decision-making, politically correct science has skewed decision-making in the wrong direction. The contributors believe that regulations based on environmental health myths could lead society astray, exacerbating other imminent health and environmental risks.

"If countries are to prioritize efforts to promote human health and sustainable development, risks must be evaluated relative to one another," said the book's co-editor Julian Morris. "

Go to a Print friendly Page

Email this Article to a Friend

Back to the Archive