Dawkins wrong on GE/Food for activists (5/2/2003) | |
5 February 2003 DAWKINS WRONG ON GE/FOOD FOR ACTIVISTS 1.DAWKINS WRONG *** 1. Dawkins wrong The Times, 1 February 03 Sir, Professor Richard Dawkins's assertion that genes are a "software sub-routine", which can therefore be moved with precision by genetic engineering between totally unrelated organisms (T2, January 28), reflects the naivete of individuals who theorise about genetics rather than those working with it first-hand. Genetic engineering, either in an animal or plant context, always has unpredictable outcomes and they are frequently greater than the intended change. This is because it is wrong to consider genes as independent units of information, which can be accurately slotted into the genetic code of any organism. Genes have evolved within a given organism to work in combinations in the context of an immensely complex genetic, biochemical and ecological environment. The "Luddism" of the Prince of Wales and Peter Melchett in objecting to GM food on this occasion is supported by empirical scientific observation. Michael Antoniou (Lecturer in molecular genetics) *** 2.FOOD FOR ACTIVISTS http://www.crosswalk.com/news/1183938.html?view=print |