1.Groups seek ban on engineered trees - UPI article
2.Organizations Around the World Demand Ban of Genetically Engineered Trees from Kyoto Protocol - press release
---

1.Groups seek ban on engineered trees
United Press International, November 15 2006 http://www.market-day.net/article_39339/20061115/Groups-seek-ban-on-engineered-trees.php

UNITED NATIONS, Nov. 15 (UPI) -- Environmental groups urged United Nations treaty signers to bar genetically engineered trees from the Kyoto Protocol on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Genetically engineered trees have been proposed for plantations created to offset carbon emissions as part of the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism, the organizations said in a news release. However, research has shown that native forests absorb and hold more carbon than industrial plantations.

The organizations said genetically engineered trees can worsen global warming by aggravating problems associated with single-culture tree plantations or creating new issues such as altered decomposition.

The organizations said the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change must align its policies with the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity, which already has taken a position against genetically engineered trees.

"Genetically engineered trees do not offer a solution to global warming, rather they are a global distraction from finding real solutions," the organizations wrote to U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change members.

Groups endorsing this action include Bangladesh Krishok Federation, Carbon Trade Watch, Global Forest Coalition, Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth-Nigeria, FASE-Espirito Santo, Brazil, Large Scale Biofuels Action Group, Oilwatch International, STOP GE Trees Campaign, Timberwatch Coalition and The Corner House.
---

2.Organizations Around the World Demand Ban of Genetically Engineered Trees from Kyoto Protocol
For Immediate Release 15 November 2006

World Rainforest Movement and Global Justice Ecology Project have presented a demand to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Nairobi, Kenya to ban the use of genetically engineered trees under the Kyoto Protocol. GE trees have been proposed for use in plantations developed as climate sinks or for biofuels.

At the Ninth Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change held in Milan in 2003, genetically engineered (GE) trees [also known as genetically modified or transgenic trees] were approved for use in plantations created to offset carbon emissions as a part of the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism. Research, however, actually shows:

o Native forests overall absorb and hold far more carbon than industrial tree plantations, which can also be responsible for net combined soil-carbon releases and carbon emissions during their life-cycle;

* Plantations bring many additional problems that contribute to global warming and ecological destruction, including water and nutrient depletion, increased soil salinity and acidity, increased fire risk and biodiversity loss;

* GE trees (e.g. Bt and reduced lignin trees) may actually worsen global warming by exacerbating problems caused by monoculture tree plantations, and by causing unprecedented new ones, including alteration of decomposition, insect and disease patterns.

For this reason, many organizations around the world in several official and unofficial events have called on the UNFCCC to ban GE trees from the Kyoto Protocol.

In addition, the UNFCCC must bring its policies in line with the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, which has taken a stand against GE trees.

On Wednesday, 22 March, 2006 during the Eighth Conference of the Parties of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, representatives from non-governmental organizations, social movements, scientists, indigenous groups, farmers, foresters and others were joined by CBD delegates from ten countries in calling for a moratorium on the release of GE trees into the environment.

As a result, the UN CBD made an historic decision, acknowledging for the first time the potential dangers—both social and ecological—of genetically engineered trees and urging countries to take a very cautious approach to the technology.

It is now the responsibility of the UNFCCC to end the contradiction between its own pro-GE trees decision and the UN CBD’s cautionary decision. The UNFCCC must issue a new decision prohibiting the use of GE trees in carbon offset plantations under the CDM.

Genetically engineered trees do not offer a solution to global warming, rather they are a global distraction from finding real solutions to the problems of global warming. In addition, they threaten the world’s forests and forest-dwelling communities.

For this reason, the above groups call on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to bring its policies in line with those of the UN CBD and prohibit the use of genetically engineered trees in carbon sink plantations.

Groups endorsing this demand include Bangladesh Krishok Federation, Carbon Trade Watch, Global Forest Coalition, Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth—Nigeria, FASE—Espirito Santo, Brazil, Large Scale Biofuels Action Group, Oilwatch International, STOP GE Trees Campaign, Timberwatch Coalition and The Corner House.

For the full text of the open letter, go to: http://www.wrm.org.uy/actors/CCC/Nairobi/Open_Letter.html

Go to a Print friendly Page

Email this Article to a Friend

Back to the Archive